A date thats been firmly in my diary and much anticipated since Christmas is the 2/2/2010. I attended a workshop held by the charity Photovoice that aimed to educate on what participatory photography is? how it can be used and the roles of the facilitator in side and out side of the workshop?
Im really interested in the idea of holding photographic workshops my self, and this course raised some pretty important questions and topics, that need to be understood before being able to produce and carry out a work shop that will benefit those attending.
Participation is involvement by local population and additional stake holders in the creation, content and conduct of a programme or policy designed to change lives. Built on a belief that citizens can be trusted to shape their own future, participatory development uses local decision making and capacities to steer and define the nature of an intervention. (photovoice)
However it is not participation if the population is manipulated into conforming to a preconceived idea, or the purpose is to persuade the participants that the programme they are taking part in is great even though they have had no real input to the outcome. There is a fine line between participation and manipulation and it shouldn’t be crossed.I realized there is an art to facilitation, it really requires someone to
- take a back seat and observe closely
- know when to speed things up/slow things down
- provide an objective eye
- encourage new ideas
- keep the group focused
- provide both sides
- ensure everyone understands
- repeat learning points
I could go on with the list, but it seems there is a lot to fit into the role with out giving too much direction. I had a brief go at facilitation at the end of the day during an intense 10 min assignment, and although it was a challenge, I really enjoyed watching the journey of the out come and felt quite happy with the result. At times though you can see through an editorial eye what images work best with each other, but you have to bite your tongue, and provoke questioning to ensure they can see and understand what they are doing without telling them what you think it should be. This kind of work can build confidence whilst being creative and fun, and developing both learning and social skills. It can also build community and dialogue, raise awareness and create media coverage.
However, this form of work can also be criticized in many ways. Here are some quotes that have got me thinking about how we could and maybe should be trying to push the boundaries of participatory photography..
…the ‘charitable’ gift of photography to impoverished children often may be found to serve donors more than recipients. (Julia Ballerini)
I have often seen images from these projects that undercut the good intentions of the projects initiators by falling back into the old stereotypes and power dynamics that the collaborative process intends to avoid.(Foto8blog,2008)
This quote immediately brings into question in my mind the idea of a ‘stereotype’. Who stereotypes who?how? and are we just trying to re-brand people in a different way?a way that feels sociably acceptable? maybe that sits better with our conscience? I think that western culture stereotypes much more easily through the media, and I guess that a photography workshop could swing either way depending on the point of change that community is currently in.
I am intrigued by the concept and aims of participatory photography, although there are many questions to ask and answers I need to know, I feel Im on a good foundation to begin exploring the subject. I feel these questions have probably been babbling facilitators minds for a while now, and in an ideal world I would like to help come up with some solutions to narrow the possibilities of any negative impact.